NullFloat64
(t *testing.T)
| 566 | |
| 567 | // NullFloat64 |
| 568 | func TestEncoceSQLNullFloat64(t *testing.T) { |
| 569 | testCases := []struct { |
| 570 | name string |
| 571 | sqlNullFloat64 sql.NullFloat64 |
| 572 | expectedResult string |
| 573 | err bool |
| 574 | }{ |
| 575 | { |
| 576 | name: "it should encode a null string", |
| 577 | sqlNullFloat64: sql.NullFloat64{ |
| 578 | Float64: float64(1), |
| 579 | }, |
| 580 | expectedResult: `1`, |
| 581 | }, |
| 582 | { |
| 583 | name: "it should return an err as the string is invalid", |
| 584 | sqlNullFloat64: sql.NullFloat64{ |
| 585 | Float64: float64(2), |
| 586 | }, |
| 587 | expectedResult: `2`, |
| 588 | }, |
| 589 | } |
| 590 | |
| 591 | for _, testCase := range testCases { |
| 592 | t.Run(testCase.name, func(t *testing.T) { |
| 593 | var b strings.Builder |
| 594 | enc := NewEncoder(&b) |
| 595 | err := enc.EncodeSQLNullFloat64(&testCase.sqlNullFloat64) |
| 596 | if testCase.err { |
| 597 | assert.NotNil(t, err) |
| 598 | } else { |
| 599 | assert.Nil(t, err) |
| 600 | assert.Equal(t, testCase.expectedResult, b.String()) |
| 601 | } |
| 602 | }) |
| 603 | } |
| 604 | t.Run( |
| 605 | "should panic as the encoder is pooled", |
| 606 | func(t *testing.T) { |
| 607 | builder := &strings.Builder{} |
| 608 | enc := NewEncoder(builder) |
| 609 | enc.isPooled = 1 |
| 610 | defer func() { |
| 611 | err := recover() |
| 612 | assert.NotNil(t, err, "err should not be nil") |
| 613 | assert.IsType(t, InvalidUsagePooledEncoderError(""), err, "err should be of type InvalidUsagePooledEncoderError") |
| 614 | }() |
| 615 | _ = enc.EncodeSQLNullFloat64(&sql.NullFloat64{}) |
| 616 | assert.True(t, false, "should not be called as encoder should have panicked") |
| 617 | }, |
| 618 | ) |
| 619 | |
| 620 | t.Run( |
| 621 | "should return an error as the writer encounters an error", |
| 622 | func(t *testing.T) { |
| 623 | builder := TestWriterError("") |
| 624 | enc := NewEncoder(builder) |
| 625 | err := enc.EncodeSQLNullFloat64(&sql.NullFloat64{}) |
nothing calls this directly
no test coverage detected
searching dependent graphs…