(returnFiber, currentFirstChild, newChildren, expirationTime)
| 9283 | } |
| 9284 | |
| 9285 | function reconcileChildrenArray(returnFiber, currentFirstChild, newChildren, expirationTime) { |
| 9286 | // This algorithm can't optimize by searching from boths ends since we |
| 9287 | // don't have backpointers on fibers. I'm trying to see how far we can get |
| 9288 | // with that model. If it ends up not being worth the tradeoffs, we can |
| 9289 | // add it later. |
| 9290 | |
| 9291 | // Even with a two ended optimization, we'd want to optimize for the case |
| 9292 | // where there are few changes and brute force the comparison instead of |
| 9293 | // going for the Map. It'd like to explore hitting that path first in |
| 9294 | // forward-only mode and only go for the Map once we notice that we need |
| 9295 | // lots of look ahead. This doesn't handle reversal as well as two ended |
| 9296 | // search but that's unusual. Besides, for the two ended optimization to |
| 9297 | // work on Iterables, we'd need to copy the whole set. |
| 9298 | |
| 9299 | // In this first iteration, we'll just live with hitting the bad case |
| 9300 | // (adding everything to a Map) in for every insert/move. |
| 9301 | |
| 9302 | // If you change this code, also update reconcileChildrenIterator() which |
| 9303 | // uses the same algorithm. |
| 9304 | |
| 9305 | { |
| 9306 | // First, validate keys. |
| 9307 | var knownKeys = null; |
| 9308 | for (var i = 0; i < newChildren.length; i++) { |
| 9309 | var child = newChildren[i]; |
| 9310 | knownKeys = warnOnInvalidKey(child, knownKeys); |
| 9311 | } |
| 9312 | } |
| 9313 | |
| 9314 | var resultingFirstChild = null; |
| 9315 | var previousNewFiber = null; |
| 9316 | |
| 9317 | var oldFiber = currentFirstChild; |
| 9318 | var lastPlacedIndex = 0; |
| 9319 | var newIdx = 0; |
| 9320 | var nextOldFiber = null; |
| 9321 | for (; oldFiber !== null && newIdx < newChildren.length; newIdx++) { |
| 9322 | if (oldFiber.index > newIdx) { |
| 9323 | nextOldFiber = oldFiber; |
| 9324 | oldFiber = null; |
| 9325 | } else { |
| 9326 | nextOldFiber = oldFiber.sibling; |
| 9327 | } |
| 9328 | var newFiber = updateSlot(returnFiber, oldFiber, newChildren[newIdx], expirationTime); |
| 9329 | if (newFiber === null) { |
| 9330 | // TODO: This breaks on empty slots like null children. That's |
| 9331 | // unfortunate because it triggers the slow path all the time. We need |
| 9332 | // a better way to communicate whether this was a miss or null, |
| 9333 | // boolean, undefined, etc. |
| 9334 | if (oldFiber === null) { |
| 9335 | oldFiber = nextOldFiber; |
| 9336 | } |
| 9337 | break; |
| 9338 | } |
| 9339 | if (shouldTrackSideEffects) { |
| 9340 | if (oldFiber && newFiber.alternate === null) { |
| 9341 | // We matched the slot, but we didn't reuse the existing fiber, so we |
| 9342 | // need to delete the existing child. |
no test coverage detected