(returnFiber, currentFirstChild, newChildren, expirationTime)
| 9499 | } |
| 9500 | |
| 9501 | function reconcileChildrenArray(returnFiber, currentFirstChild, newChildren, expirationTime) { |
| 9502 | // This algorithm can't optimize by searching from boths ends since we |
| 9503 | // don't have backpointers on fibers. I'm trying to see how far we can get |
| 9504 | // with that model. If it ends up not being worth the tradeoffs, we can |
| 9505 | // add it later. |
| 9506 | |
| 9507 | // Even with a two ended optimization, we'd want to optimize for the case |
| 9508 | // where there are few changes and brute force the comparison instead of |
| 9509 | // going for the Map. It'd like to explore hitting that path first in |
| 9510 | // forward-only mode and only go for the Map once we notice that we need |
| 9511 | // lots of look ahead. This doesn't handle reversal as well as two ended |
| 9512 | // search but that's unusual. Besides, for the two ended optimization to |
| 9513 | // work on Iterables, we'd need to copy the whole set. |
| 9514 | |
| 9515 | // In this first iteration, we'll just live with hitting the bad case |
| 9516 | // (adding everything to a Map) in for every insert/move. |
| 9517 | |
| 9518 | // If you change this code, also update reconcileChildrenIterator() which |
| 9519 | // uses the same algorithm. |
| 9520 | |
| 9521 | { |
| 9522 | // First, validate keys. |
| 9523 | var knownKeys = null; |
| 9524 | for (var i = 0; i < newChildren.length; i++) { |
| 9525 | var child = newChildren[i]; |
| 9526 | knownKeys = warnOnInvalidKey(child, knownKeys); |
| 9527 | } |
| 9528 | } |
| 9529 | |
| 9530 | var resultingFirstChild = null; |
| 9531 | var previousNewFiber = null; |
| 9532 | |
| 9533 | var oldFiber = currentFirstChild; |
| 9534 | var lastPlacedIndex = 0; |
| 9535 | var newIdx = 0; |
| 9536 | var nextOldFiber = null; |
| 9537 | for (; oldFiber !== null && newIdx < newChildren.length; newIdx++) { |
| 9538 | if (oldFiber.index > newIdx) { |
| 9539 | nextOldFiber = oldFiber; |
| 9540 | oldFiber = null; |
| 9541 | } else { |
| 9542 | nextOldFiber = oldFiber.sibling; |
| 9543 | } |
| 9544 | var newFiber = updateSlot(returnFiber, oldFiber, newChildren[newIdx], expirationTime); |
| 9545 | if (newFiber === null) { |
| 9546 | // TODO: This breaks on empty slots like null children. That's |
| 9547 | // unfortunate because it triggers the slow path all the time. We need |
| 9548 | // a better way to communicate whether this was a miss or null, |
| 9549 | // boolean, undefined, etc. |
| 9550 | if (oldFiber === null) { |
| 9551 | oldFiber = nextOldFiber; |
| 9552 | } |
| 9553 | break; |
| 9554 | } |
| 9555 | if (shouldTrackSideEffects) { |
| 9556 | if (oldFiber && newFiber.alternate === null) { |
| 9557 | // We matched the slot, but we didn't reuse the existing fiber, so we |
| 9558 | // need to delete the existing child. |
no test coverage detected