(returnFiber, currentFirstChild, newChildren, expirationTime)
| 9248 | } |
| 9249 | |
| 9250 | function reconcileChildrenArray(returnFiber, currentFirstChild, newChildren, expirationTime) { |
| 9251 | // This algorithm can't optimize by searching from boths ends since we |
| 9252 | // don't have backpointers on fibers. I'm trying to see how far we can get |
| 9253 | // with that model. If it ends up not being worth the tradeoffs, we can |
| 9254 | // add it later. |
| 9255 | |
| 9256 | // Even with a two ended optimization, we'd want to optimize for the case |
| 9257 | // where there are few changes and brute force the comparison instead of |
| 9258 | // going for the Map. It'd like to explore hitting that path first in |
| 9259 | // forward-only mode and only go for the Map once we notice that we need |
| 9260 | // lots of look ahead. This doesn't handle reversal as well as two ended |
| 9261 | // search but that's unusual. Besides, for the two ended optimization to |
| 9262 | // work on Iterables, we'd need to copy the whole set. |
| 9263 | |
| 9264 | // In this first iteration, we'll just live with hitting the bad case |
| 9265 | // (adding everything to a Map) in for every insert/move. |
| 9266 | |
| 9267 | // If you change this code, also update reconcileChildrenIterator() which |
| 9268 | // uses the same algorithm. |
| 9269 | |
| 9270 | { |
| 9271 | // First, validate keys. |
| 9272 | var knownKeys = null; |
| 9273 | for (var i = 0; i < newChildren.length; i++) { |
| 9274 | var child = newChildren[i]; |
| 9275 | knownKeys = warnOnInvalidKey(child, knownKeys); |
| 9276 | } |
| 9277 | } |
| 9278 | |
| 9279 | var resultingFirstChild = null; |
| 9280 | var previousNewFiber = null; |
| 9281 | |
| 9282 | var oldFiber = currentFirstChild; |
| 9283 | var lastPlacedIndex = 0; |
| 9284 | var newIdx = 0; |
| 9285 | var nextOldFiber = null; |
| 9286 | for (; oldFiber !== null && newIdx < newChildren.length; newIdx++) { |
| 9287 | if (oldFiber.index > newIdx) { |
| 9288 | nextOldFiber = oldFiber; |
| 9289 | oldFiber = null; |
| 9290 | } else { |
| 9291 | nextOldFiber = oldFiber.sibling; |
| 9292 | } |
| 9293 | var newFiber = updateSlot(returnFiber, oldFiber, newChildren[newIdx], expirationTime); |
| 9294 | if (newFiber === null) { |
| 9295 | // TODO: This breaks on empty slots like null children. That's |
| 9296 | // unfortunate because it triggers the slow path all the time. We need |
| 9297 | // a better way to communicate whether this was a miss or null, |
| 9298 | // boolean, undefined, etc. |
| 9299 | if (oldFiber === null) { |
| 9300 | oldFiber = nextOldFiber; |
| 9301 | } |
| 9302 | break; |
| 9303 | } |
| 9304 | if (shouldTrackSideEffects) { |
| 9305 | if (oldFiber && newFiber.alternate === null) { |
| 9306 | // We matched the slot, but we didn't reuse the existing fiber, so we |
| 9307 | // need to delete the existing child. |
no test coverage detected