()
| 86 | |
| 87 | |
| 88 | def test_root_model_field_override(): |
| 89 | # Weird as this is, I think it's probably best to allow it to ensure it is possible to override |
| 90 | # the annotation in subclasses of RootModel subclasses. Basically, I think retaining the flexibility |
| 91 | # is worth the increased potential for weird/confusing "accidental" overrides. |
| 92 | |
| 93 | # I'm mostly including this test now to document the behavior |
| 94 | class Model(RootModel[int]): |
| 95 | root: str |
| 96 | |
| 97 | assert Model.model_validate('abc').root == 'abc' |
| 98 | with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc_info: |
| 99 | Model.model_validate(1) |
| 100 | assert exc_info.value.errors(include_url=False) == [ |
| 101 | {'input': 1, 'loc': (), 'msg': 'Input should be a valid string', 'type': 'string_type'} |
| 102 | ] |
| 103 | |
| 104 | class SubModel(Model): |
| 105 | root: float |
| 106 | |
| 107 | with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc_info: |
| 108 | SubModel.model_validate('abc') |
| 109 | assert exc_info.value.errors(include_url=False) == [ |
| 110 | { |
| 111 | 'input': 'abc', |
| 112 | 'loc': (), |
| 113 | 'msg': 'Input should be a valid number, unable to parse string as a number', |
| 114 | 'type': 'float_parsing', |
| 115 | } |
| 116 | ] |
| 117 | |
| 118 | validated = SubModel.model_validate_json('1').root |
| 119 | assert validated == 1.0 |
| 120 | assert isinstance(validated, float) |
| 121 | |
| 122 | |
| 123 | def test_frozen_field_repr(): |
nothing calls this directly
no test coverage detected