MCPcopy
hub / github.com/urllib3/urllib3 / find_unused_port

Function find_unused_port

test/port_helpers.py:14–75  ·  view source on GitHub ↗

Returns an unused port that should be suitable for binding. This is achieved by creating a temporary socket with the same family and type as the 'sock' parameter (default is AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM), and binding it to the specified host address (defaults to 0.0.0.0) with the port set to 0,

(
    family: socket.AddressFamily = socket.AF_INET,
    socktype: socket.SocketKind = socket.SOCK_STREAM,
)

Source from the content-addressed store, hash-verified

12
13
14def find_unused_port(
15 family: socket.AddressFamily = socket.AF_INET,
16 socktype: socket.SocketKind = socket.SOCK_STREAM,
17) -> int:
18 """Returns an unused port that should be suitable for binding. This is
19 achieved by creating a temporary socket with the same family and type as
20 the 'sock' parameter (default is AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM), and binding it to
21 the specified host address (defaults to 0.0.0.0) with the port set to 0,
22 eliciting an unused ephemeral port from the OS. The temporary socket is
23 then closed and deleted, and the ephemeral port is returned.
24
25 Either this method or bind_port() should be used for any tests where a
26 server socket needs to be bound to a particular port for the duration of
27 the test. Which one to use depends on whether the calling code is creating
28 a python socket, or if an unused port needs to be provided in a constructor
29 or passed to an external program (i.e. the -accept argument to openssl's
30 s_server mode). Always prefer bind_port() over find_unused_port() where
31 possible. Hard coded ports should *NEVER* be used. As soon as a server
32 socket is bound to a hard coded port, the ability to run multiple instances
33 of the test simultaneously on the same host is compromised, which makes the
34 test a ticking time bomb in a buildbot environment. On Unix buildbots, this
35 may simply manifest as a failed test, which can be recovered from without
36 intervention in most cases, but on Windows, the entire python process can
37 completely and utterly wedge, requiring someone to log in to the buildbot
38 and manually kill the affected process.
39
40 (This is easy to reproduce on Windows, unfortunately, and can be traced to
41 the SO_REUSEADDR socket option having different semantics on Windows versus
42 Unix/Linux. On Unix, you can't have two AF_INET SOCK_STREAM sockets bind,
43 listen and then accept connections on identical host/ports. An EADDRINUSE
44 OSError will be raised at some point (depending on the platform and
45 the order bind and listen were called on each socket).
46
47 However, on Windows, if SO_REUSEADDR is set on the sockets, no EADDRINUSE
48 will ever be raised when attempting to bind two identical host/ports. When
49 accept() is called on each socket, the second caller's process will steal
50 the port from the first caller, leaving them both in an awkwardly wedged
51 state where they'll no longer respond to any signals or graceful kills, and
52 must be forcibly killed via OpenProcess()/TerminateProcess().
53
54 The solution on Windows is to use the SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE socket option
55 instead of SO_REUSEADDR, which effectively affords the same semantics as
56 SO_REUSEADDR on Unix. Given the propensity of Unix developers in the Open
57 Source world compared to Windows ones, this is a common mistake. A quick
58 look over OpenSSL's 0.9.8g source shows that they use SO_REUSEADDR when
59 openssl.exe is called with the 's_server' option, for example. See
60 http://bugs.python.org/issue2550 for more info. The following site also
61 has a very thorough description about the implications of both REUSEADDR
62 and EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE on Windows:
63 http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms740621(VS.85).aspx)
64
65 XXX: although this approach is a vast improvement on previous attempts to
66 elicit unused ports, it rests heavily on the assumption that the ephemeral
67 port returned to us by the OS won't immediately be dished back out to some
68 other process when we close and delete our temporary socket but before our
69 calling code has a chance to bind the returned port. We can deal with this
70 issue if/when we come across it."""
71

Callers 4

test_no_responseFunction · 0.85
test_retriesFunction · 0.85

Calls 1

bind_portFunction · 0.85

Tested by 4

test_no_responseFunction · 0.68
test_retriesFunction · 0.68